|
|
Post by valfromrome on Nov 7, 2012 16:10:54 GMT -5
Audrey's line about her only memories being from the past 6 months really threw me, because I don't see how it adds up with the other stuff.
I think Audrey has been living in Haven for 6 months now...I think I read somewhere that the events that are happening in Haven cover just 6 months. I am not sure about it because it was something I read some months ago and I might be totally wrong. Gotta check this point. Anyway your theory works nonetheless. Nathan talked about his trouble coming back about 2 years before, so right now we should be in the third year of the Troubles even if Audrey has showed up just six months ago. ETAHere the timeline havenmaine.wikia.com/wiki/Audrey_Parker_(blonde). She arrived in Haven in June 2010 (S01E01) and Season 2 starts in October 2010. How long does S2 lasts? Less than 6 months? More? Anyway I think Audrey has been living in Haven for more than 6 months, most likely a year. |
|
|
|
Post by killabeez on Nov 7, 2012 16:19:40 GMT -5
Anyway your theory works nonetheless. Nathan talked about his trouble coming back about 2 years before, so right now we should be in the third year of the Troubles even if Audrey has showed up just six months ago. The part that doesn't work with that, though, is Duke asking whether the Troubles are back (in 1.03). Why would he ask that if the Troubles have already been back for two and a half years? He just noticed? And I think, though I can't be positive, that he's not the only person who said that in S1. It seems weird to me that people would be commenting on the Troubles being back if it had started two and a half years before. The mythology in this show is so complicated it's funny. In rewatching 301, I noticed again how much Audrey's kidnapper looks and sounds like Nathan. He definitely doesn't look or sound like Tommy, and you can see the edge of his hair (which looks like Nathan's). Oh, show. I R confused. |
|
|
|
Post by valfromrome on Nov 7, 2012 16:25:48 GMT -5
Yep this is what doesn't work much. Maybe just few Troubles showed up and there were rumors about them but only when Audrey arrived the Troubles were back for real?
As for the BGK, I don't think it's Tommy. I think Tommy knows who he/she/it is and works with the killer.
I don't think it has nothing to do with Nathan, but they are good at misleading us. Also the CK looks like Nathan...
Btw found something more about the timeline, which I posted in my previous comment.
|
|
|
|
Post by killabeez on Nov 7, 2012 16:51:06 GMT -5
Thank you for the link. I wonder where they got the October 2010 date from? (for S2)
ETA: And incidentally, that doesn't make sense. If Nathan's trouble first occurred in 1983, and they're on a 27 year cycle, then it should have recurred in 2010. Not in late 2008, which is what would have to be the case for the whole "two years ago Duke and I got in a fight" story to be true.
|
|
|
|
Post by valfromrome on Nov 7, 2012 17:01:30 GMT -5
Thank you for the link. I wonder where they got the October 2010 date from? (for S2) ETA: And incidentally, that doesn't make sense. If Nathan's trouble first occurred in 1983, and they're on a 27 year cycle, then it should have recurred in 2010. Not in late 2008, which is what would have to be the case for the whole "two years ago Duke and I got in a fight" story to be true. You are right. I asked to some friends on Twitter and they think Audrey's been in Haven for just six months. About when Nathan got his affliction again, I have the feeling that if everything is set in 2010, they might have made a mistake with the timeline. Also I do think it's set in one year because of the evolution of the relationship. What happened and is still happening between Nathan/Duke/Audrey makes sense in a moderately short time, otherwise 2 years for a kiss (nathan/audrey) and 3 for another one? It would be too stretched. |
|
dordoris
Drunk and Disorderly
Posts: 208
|
Post by dordoris on Nov 7, 2012 17:36:34 GMT -5
yeah, that's my point since the beginning. The Troubles were there before Audrey's arrival (maybe some months before, not a lot). And Val, I don't think they made mistakes concerning the timeline, it is a big deal and I think they thought a lot about it. It is an important information. I think there is a reason why Nathan's affliction came back early and it's even more suspicious that it happened because of Duke.
And I think we should move this discussion to Audrey's thread...
|
|
|
|
Post by valfromrome on Nov 7, 2012 18:08:56 GMT -5
You are right Doris. It's too big to be a mistake. Timelines always give me headaches. I agree. I think Nathan's affliction came back earlier, but if it is set in 2010 and it came back in 2008, it didn't follow the 27 cycle. Why? What is there about Nathan that we don't know yet? And yes this discussion should belong with the Audrey or the Audrey/Nathan/Duke thread. Next one who comments can do there  |
|
dordoris
Drunk and Disorderly
Posts: 208
|
Post by dordoris on Nov 7, 2012 22:35:06 GMT -5
Back to James now. The bolt gun killer said Lucy wasn't the only one who loved the colorado kid. It bothers me, why would he love him? Was he talking about himself?
|
|
|
|
Post by killabeez on Nov 7, 2012 23:00:03 GMT -5
Back to James now. The bolt gun killer said Lucy wasn't the only one who loved the colorado kid. It bothers me, why would he love him? Was he talking about himself? He also accused Audrey of being possessive about James. That whole scene was highly weird. I can't imagine who he was talking about if not himself—unless he's being paid by someone to find out what happened to James. |
|
|
|
Post by valfromrome on Nov 8, 2012 4:10:22 GMT -5
Back to James now. The bolt gun killer said Lucy wasn't the only one who loved the colorado kid. It bothers me, why would he love him? Was he talking about himself? He also accused Audrey of being possessive about James. That whole scene was highly weird. I can't imagine who he was talking about if not himself—unless he's being paid by someone to find out what happened to James. Maybe because the BGK is a chameleon that used to be in love with James. Might he be Arla? I think he is trying to build a woman that looked like James's wife. So if this is true I also understand why he thinks Audrey (well Lucy) was possessive of James. Maybe Lucy knew about James more than Audrey actually does. |
|
|
|
Post by killabeez on Nov 8, 2012 10:26:58 GMT -5
Maybe because the BGK is a chameleon that used to be in love with James. Might he be Arla? I think he is trying to build a woman that looked like James's wife. Makes as much sense as anything! |
|
|
|
Post by valfromrome on Nov 8, 2012 12:36:56 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by officerparker on Nov 8, 2012 12:50:23 GMT -5
from the seasons change I thought Audrey had been in Haven for a couple of years, specially because the christmas special is supposed to be placed in July (Audrey mentions Chris) and there's NO WAY it's placed in July of the first year Audrey arrived in Haven (because she arrived in June).
I think Duke had been away from Haven for a while. Wasn't he on a trip or something and only went back recently (as in the pilot)? He wouldn't really know about the troubles if that was the case.
Maybe Audrey goes back to Haven every 27 years? Otherwise the troubles starting in 2008 would make no sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by killabeez on Nov 8, 2012 13:27:16 GMT -5
from the seasons change I thought Audrey had been in Haven for a couple of years, specially because the christmas special is supposed to be placed in July (Audrey mentions Chris) and there's NO WAY it's placed in July of the first year Audrey arrived in Haven (because she arrived in June). This is my thought, too. I definitely assumed she'd been there at least a year until her "six months" line in 301. He had been away until his fight with Nathan on the boat, which supposedly happened "a couple of years" before 2.12. So yes, that does make sense if there's at least a year between the beginning of the series and 2.12. |
|
